I am Article Layout

Select your investor profile:

This content is only for the selected type of investor.

Individual investors?

ESG considerations in sovereign bond investment

March 2022
Marketing Material

Sovereign bond investing: a climate-focused approach

When it comes to responsible investment strategies, sovereign bonds have so far largely been overlooked. We believe that needs to change.

Responsible investment has taken equity markets by storm. Although its penetration into fixed income markets has been slower, it is picking up speed there too. Yet one area remains overlooked – government bonds.

That’s a major oversight. After all, governments set the rules and regulations that companies and individuals follow, and without their support and investment, the world will not be able to tackle its most pressing problems – climate change in particular. 

Global average temperatures are already 1.2C higher than they were in the pre-industrial era. And even if countries deliver on all the carbon emission-cutting pledges made so far, that degree of warming is expected to double to 2.4C by 2100.1

Fixed income investors have a key part to play in providing the capital required to keep climate change in check. While individually, investors have a negligible influence on government policy, collectively they can make a real difference – after all, the investment community holds USD88 trillion in bonds issued by governments and their agencies.2

Focus on emissions

So how might fixed income investors construct government bond portfolios in a way that has biggest possible impact in the fight against climate change? 

Investors in emerging market bonds are central to the transition. That’s because developing economies are more vulnerable to the physical impacts of global warming than their developed counterparts, in part due to geographical factors, but also because of weaker economic and institutional underpinnings. At the same time, emerging nations can be global leaders in many of the technologies needed for transition. But investors in developed sovereign bond markets also have a key role to play in the transition. 

In all cases, however, the key to climate-focused government bond investing is high-quality data and the ability to draw accurate conclusions from it. Only then can investors be sure of making sound capital allocation decisions.

Identifying ESG-aligned government bonds requires investors to focus on the root cause of global warming – greenhouse gas emissions. While methane and nitrous oxide clearly play a part, CO2 accounts for 74 per cent of all emissions.3 Our research  shows that emissions of the different greenhouse gases tend to be correlated; countries with high emissions of one tend to also generate a lot of the others.

The next question to tackle is how to measure and compare emissions by country. In absolute terms, bigger countries will obviously have larger greenhouse gas emissions than smaller ones. On this measure, China the biggest emitter. Looking at things on a per capita basis paints a somewhat different picture, however. Mongolia comes out in the “lead” while China emits less than the US, Russia or Australia.

An even more effective way is to compare emissions relative to the size of the economy – after all, it is the total level that matters from the point of view of climate.

Yet looking at GDP alone has its limits. The UK, for example, imports a relatively high volume of foreign goods, the emissions for the production of which are accounted for on other countries’ balance sheets. Some experts argue that imported CO2 emissions should be added to the importer's carbon footprint. But this is difficult to capture with any degree of accuracy. Ultimately, we believe each government is responsible only for its domestic policy; they do not have direct control over how their imports are produced. 

Based on today’s level of emissions relative to GDP, bond investors should reward Western Europe (particularly Scandinavia). Some emerging markets, such as Mexico, are also relatively green. To tackle global warming, though, fixed income investors also have a duty to incentivise the laggards to reduce emissions. In other words, bond investors should consider allocating capital to countries whose carbon emissions are falling at the steepest rate relative to the size of their economy (see Fig. 1). 

Focusing investments in the bonds of these nations may mean leaving out countries which are the mainstays of traditional bond indices. But that, in turn, increases diversification benefits for investors and should placate those who complain that funds that claim to embed environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria are too often remarkably similar in their composition to non-ESG labelled ones.

Fig. 1 - Lowering emissions
Countries with highest CO2 emission reductions, 2020 vs 2019 (%)
top emission reductions

Data as of 23.02.2022. Emissions exclude land use, land use-change and forestry (LULUCF) as data not yet available.

Data tells only part of the story and is, by its nature, backward looking. Future emissions are determined by policies implemented today, which is why it makes sense to incorporate a qualitative assessment of each country’s regulation and policy path, comparing it to the Paris Agreement goals. Net zero pledges are a good start, but they must also be followed by concrete action.

By focusing on countries that are actively working on reducing emissions, sovereign bond investors can play a part in the fight against climate change and significantly reduce the carbon footprint of their own portfolios. As more investors take this view, we believe we can start to incentivise change in government policy.

Green returns

In terms of the type of investment, green bonds are a natural choice for climate-conscious government bond investors. It’s a small but rapidly growing universe. According to research by Pictet Asset Management and the Institute of International Finance, the size of the sustainable bond market almost doubled in 2021. But the bulk of that growth came from corporate bond markets and the total amount of ESG-labelled debt accounts for only 2 per cent of the overall bond universe. By 2030, however, that proportion could be as high as a third, with particularly strong growth in emerging markets, the analysis shows.5

As well as its limited size (so far), the green bond market is hampered by a lack of universal rules and standards. Currently, the labelling and certification of sustainable bonds differs considerably from one country to another, while efforts to harmonise disclosure requirements haven’t met with much success. We expect to see increased standardisation as the green bond market deepens and increases in value. 

Given these limitations, we believe that a climate-focused sovereign debt portfolio shouldn’t focus exclusively on green bonds. It should also invest extensively in traditional bonds, which are in greater supply, are easier to understand and exhibit more attractive valuations. 

This last point is worth stressing. The return potential of any investment is of paramount importance, and we believe that there is no need for compromise here. Our research with IIF shows that returns on green government bonds have outpaced those on conventional benchmarks since end-2017, with an average monthly excess return of over 1 basis point. Other studies, meanwhile, find a positive correlation between climate vulnerability and the cost of borrowing, particularly in emerging markets – even after other macroeconomic variables are taken into account.

Backtesting points to outperformance of a climate-focused portfolio relative to the benchmark.6 Furthermore, the use of an overlay strategy can help reduce currency, interest rate and spread risks.

Change starts with planting a seed.

Change starts with planting a seed. When Pictet launched its water equity investment strategy back in 2000, investments targeting positive change and sustainability were virtually unheard of. Two decades later, such strategies are mainstream and thriving. In just a year from launch, the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative has gained 220 signatories, who together manage USD57 trillion.7 We believe it is now time to transform sovereign bond investing by embracing climate change concerns and incentivising change – both through dedicated strategies and through including these considerations in the investment decision process for conventional bond funds.